Saturday, May 4, 2013

Flat or Spiky?


            Technology has influenced various aspects of our world today.  As I reflect on the readings this week from Chapter 1 of Thomas L. Friedman’s book The World is Flat, I could not help but compare the analogy to my present residence in South Dakota.  As I look around at my surroundings, the world looks very flat! In the field of education, I feel that most positions and opportunities are available to me, even in my rural area.  I earned my Master’s Degree in math education from a college several hours away, and have never even stepped foot on that campus.  I am now working on my doctorate at a university four hours away, and have connected with many students from all over the United States and other countries.  Geographically, there are not limitations on my education, as I can receive the same education as someone in New York, for example. 
            As a math instructor at a small, private university, I have witnessed first-hand how advancements in technology have created a flat world.  Our university has approved an online initiative to begin classes for adult learners.  I will be instructing two of the online math courses, a challenge I am excited to tackle.  These online courses flatten the world, as students from almost any geographical location can participate and be successful.  Friedman (2007) pointed out that people are able to plug in from every corner of our world, making it possible for many different people to become empowered and to take an active role in globalization.  
            Education has been greatly altered because of technology.  Advances in technology allow students of all ages the opportunity at an education that was not available to them before.  Students in rural areas are able to connect with teachers from all over the world in order to gain knowledge in subject areas that are not provided at their current school.  Adult learners are able to earn degrees that were unavailable to them due to their personal responsibilities.  Technology has created a more flexible learning environment for these students.  Students have learned to expect a more flexible and immediate classroom environment. 
            While I believe that technology has allowed more individuals from all over the world to be active members in organizations and in educational programs, I tend to agree with Florida’s (2005) perspective that the world is spiky, which he explained as spikes in specific cities and regions that are the driving force of the world’s economy.  Technology has made it much easier for individuals to become involved, but it has not been able to solve all of our economic problems.  I can do so much from my location in rural South Dakota, but a vaster array of opportunities is available to those individuals in urban settings.  Many people still must relocate to these urban areas for certain career paths.  Florida (2005) continued to explain that the connection between these peaks has been strengthened by technology and through the easier mobility created by this technology. 
            The World is Flat (Friedman, 2007) is an intriguing book on technology from the last decade.  The first chapter focused on how outsourcing has become a part of creating a flat world, which is still relevant to today’s economy.  Outsourcing has become a large discussion in the news lately with the factory collapse in Bangladesh.  Foroohar and Saporito (2013) took a different approach to outsourcing in a recent article in Time magazine.  These authors discussed how the latest technology and cutting edge practices have brought manufacturing back to the United States.  Will technology cause more spikes in the United States, or will the trend continue to level the playing field? 

Resources: 
Florida, R. (2005, October). The world is spiky. The Atlantic Monthly, 48-51.

Foroohar, R., & Saporito, B. (2013). Made in the USA. Time, 181(15), 22.

Friedman, T. L. (2007).  The World is Flat.  New York: Picador. 

12 comments:

  1. Ashley –

    I share similar views as you regarding the flat versus spiky debate. I understand both conceptions and can argue the affirmative or negative for either theory. You education example, I thought, was quite relevant as it reaffirmed Friedman’s (2007) proposition that technology has completely changed the way we do business and interact with each other. I could, in theory, be in Lahore, Pakistan right now and have this discussion with you as long as I have a viable Internet connection. The fact that we are involved in a program in which the participants are from different countries and states indicates that the world is becoming flatter. That said, it is flat in clusters, or spiky (Florida, 2005). Areas in which technological enhancements have made it easier to connect with others are very flat, but those areas are quite clustered. There is still a significant chasm between the haves and the have nots. Will technology lessen those divide or make it bigger? I guess time will tell. I tend to think that the world will become much more spiky, but will be much flatter in the sense that there are more clusters and more people/regions that have the ability to connect and interact on personal and professional levels. I also agree with your evaluation that technology and other flatteners (Friedman, 2007) have made it much easier for people to be involved, but those flatteners are not categorically universal remedies to social and economic issues. As technological enhancements continue to be a part of everyday life, I am curious to see how we use the tools to effectively address the social and economic issues that currently plague our nation and world.

    ~ Disciple of Experience

    References

    Florida, R. (2005). The world is spiky. The Atlantic Monthly, 48-51.
    Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Using the term "cluster" seems very appropriate! As technology grows, bigger clusters form. I am also afraid that the world is going to become spikier, with many more regions of the world becoming connected. I fear that those regions that already lag behind technology will become even more disconnected as the rest of the world connects and moves forward.

      Delete
  2. I am interested in how you will be teaching Math online... I teach Finance and I have heard of Math and Finance classes online, but I wonder how much can be done in teaching it without a) live (active) feedback, and/or b) complicated tools that can show HOW to do the math...
    What tools are you using? Do you review students work? Do the students need extra skills in submitting the work? In the "old days" the students could write out their work with paper and pencil and erase mistakes, etc... is online learning of Math requiring a new set of skills for them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have been teaching online statistics for a few years now, and am constantly altering the course to try to find better ways of reaching the students! One of the best tools I utilize are 5 minute YouTube videos. We have discovered that students do not want to listen to entire lectures, so we break down the content into easily viewed chunks. Students are able to pick and choose which topics they need to spend the most time on, and which areas they understand.
      One of my favorite "new" tools is the Smart Pen. I am able to work out entire problems, and the pen records what I write and say. I can then upload the demonstration for students to view as a PDF file. They seem to really enjoy these files because it is like they are watching me demonstrate the problems in class.
      I complete my notes using SmartNotebook files. I love how easy the files come together! I am able to imbed movies, attachments, and links all in one place. Students just open the file and can navigate from there.
      Will you be teaching an online course soon?

      Delete
  3. Nice post, Ashley...and while it is flat, your home does boast the Corn Palace! When it comes to traveling the midwest, that is certainly a "spike" worth seeing! :-)

    Your university is grappling with this new flat world much the same as mine is. I am not sure we in higher education have quite figured out what digital technology actually means for us. We tried early on to do the same old things with new technology...which meant replicating lecture halls online. Now we are exploring doing new things in new ways...such as MOOCs. And as D of E noted, we have to do these new things in ways that address the real social and economic issues of our day.

    All of which should continue to make our conversations in this course interesting and relevant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree! I am excited to see where technology will lead education. I have discovered that teaching online is much more time-consuming and challenging than a traditional course.

      Delete
  4. What is interesting to me is that, in his book Redefining Global Strategy, Pankaj Ghemawat (2011) shows evidence that there is only a small level of globalization … Certainly not the age of the individual that Friedman claims. He also points out that this level of globalization is shrinking. Thus, technology is causing us to be more regionalized. I think you illustrated this point well. In rural South Dakota things seem fairly flat – and to some extent global. Compared to Sub-Saharan Africa, however, South Dakota is an economic giant.

    Around 50-60% of universities have online programs of some sort. You could probably go to school in any region you choose. You still chose a school that was only four hours away. Why not a school in Brazil, Nigeria, Spain, or some other far-away place? The truth is that most people don’t travel half-way around the globe to get their education. There is a certain level of globalization that cannot be denied, but the level of globalization that Friedman claims just isn’t happening.

    Richard Florida (2005) also illustrates that the mere presence of economic giants draws people of talent and creativity to them. Because you are an intelligent person, you are not limited by where you could attend school. I imagine you chose Creighton because it is a good school. You were, therefore, drawn to that intellectual spike over many others.

    In essence, utilizing the digital technology for education has allowed us to be separated from a specific location. However, people seem to choose to use this capability to behave in a regional and spiky manner.

    References
    1. Ghemawat, P. (2011). Redefining global strategy: Crossing borders in a world where differences still matter [Kindle Edition]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press
    2. Florida, R. (2005). The world is spiky: The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/images/issues/200510/world-is-spiky.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comments! I agree with the concept of regionalization. South Dakota may seem like an economic giant to some countries, but compared to areas such as New York City, South Dakota seems very "small". Even within our state we have areas of spikes, such as Sioux Falls, and have areas of valleys. Unfortunately, South Dakota contains some of the poorest counties in the nation. It is hard to call the world flat when my state is far from it!

      Delete
  5. Although I find it very intriguing to learn through online, I do not believe it is for everyone. Online learning is great for those who are intrinsic motivated as they will find ways to learn and find information. Through my experience working with high school students, I find that adolescents need the emotional connection to an adult for higher levels of learning to occur. The online learning has been successful for about 30% of our students. The staff does use technology within the classroom, but does not allow for students to operate on their own and individually. If this technology evolution continues and colleges continue to offer online, will K-12 education be force to move further to align to this online world or will education continue to operate in both worlds?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have made a very valid point! I have only had a few online high school students, and these were students that were extremely motivated! Almost every semester of teaching online college students, I lose several students because they are unable to keep up with the work and eventually must withdraw because they have gotten so far behind. I think it will be difficult for k-12 education to move towards online education. I feel that technology has created many tools to enhance learning and to give students more opportunities. I agree that online courses are not for everyone!

      Delete
  6. Ashley your post brings to mind a thought about how technology has influenced education. Currently at my institution we have 3 online undergraduate degree programs. We are marketing these programs to the military as well as adult learners. Offering these programs online saves the university money in some instances as well as provides a platform of convenience for students, particularly those with busy work schedules as well as those who may be limited as it relates to transportation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! We are initiating two degree programs this fall. I am excited to work with the adult learner population. The development process continues to intrigue me! How long has your institution been offering these programs?

      Delete